Which statements regarding requirements are true?

The assertions regarding requirements are considered true when they align with the principles established in requirements engineering.

The first statement likely addresses the fundamental nature of requirements, emphasizing that they pertain to stakeholder needs and expectations. This is foundational in requirements engineering, as requirements are derived directly from what stakeholders need for the system or product to satisfy their objectives.

The third statement may focus on the classification of requirements, such as functional versus non-functional requirements. Understanding this distinction is crucial for stakeholders and analysts to ensure that the system meets not only the necessary functionalities but also the quality attributes and constraints.

The fourth statement may assert that requirements should be clear and unambiguous. Clarity is essential in preventing misinterpretations that can lead to project failures or unmet stakeholder expectations. Well-defined requirements facilitate better communication among stakeholders and development teams.

The fifth statement could highlight that requirements are subject to change throughout the development process. As projects progress, new insights may emerge that necessitate adjustments to the requirements in order to better align with current needs or technological advancements. This adaptability is vital for successful project outcomes.

Given these explanations, all of the statements (I, III, IV, and V) being true indicates a comprehensive understanding of the nature of requirements in the context of requirements engineering. Recognizing