Which statement is true regarding model-based documentation compared to natural language documentation?

Model-based documentation enhances clarity and precision in requirements by using visual representations, making it easier to understand complex systems. While it's possible that the use of models can reduce the reliance on extensive natural language documentation, it's important to clarify that it does not imply that natural language documentation can be entirely omitted. Different stakeholders might still require or prefer natural language for certain aspects, particularly in cases where they are not as comfortable interpreting models or when additional context is necessary.

The other options do not accurately describe the relationship between model-based and natural language documentation. Models are designed to provide a structured and formal way to represent requirements, which can sometimes lead to misconceptions about their complexity compared to natural language descriptions. In many cases, models can simplify what might be expressed in a lengthy textual format. Additionally, model-based documentation does not eliminate the need for discussions with stakeholders; rather, it often facilitates informed discussions, helping stakeholders better visualize requirements. Lastly, models typically represent a higher level of formality than textual requirements, allowing for greater rigor in capturing and conveying the necessary information.