Which of the following techniques helps in identifying and prioritizing user requirements?

The technique of conducting stakeholder interviews is highly effective in identifying and prioritizing user requirements. This process involves direct, interactive discussions with various stakeholders, such as users, clients, and project team members, to gather insights about their needs, expectations, and experiences. During these interviews, stakeholders can express their priorities, clarify their requirements, and discuss any specific challenges they face.

These interactions enable the requirements analyst to capture a rich set of qualitative data that reveals not only the functional requirements but also potential constraints, desired features, and priority levels associated with each requirement. By synthesizing this information, analysts can create a prioritized list that reflects the collective input from diverse stakeholders, ensuring that the most critical user needs are addressed in the project.

Other techniques, although valuable in their own right, do not focus primarily on the direct gathering and prioritization of user requirements in the same way. For instance, requirements review meetings typically address already documented requirements and focus on validation and clarification rather than initial identification and prioritization. Prototype development is useful for visualizing requirements but relies on prior knowledge of what needs to be addressed. Code inspections are aimed at evaluating the quality of code after it has been developed, rather than gathering and prioritizing user requirements.