Which of the following statements about managing requirements attributes is true?

The assertion that attributes can provide insights necessary for prioritization is valid because attributes are additional pieces of information linked to requirements that help stakeholders make informed decisions throughout the development process. By defining various attributes such as urgency, importance, status, or cost, project managers and teams can evaluate and rank requirements based on business value, risk, or other criteria that are essential for prioritizing which requirements to address first. This enables a more structured and strategic approach to requirements management, ultimately leading to better project outcomes.

The other statements fall short in various ways. Stating that requirements should not have additional attributes overlooks the value that attributes provide for clarity, analysis, and documentation. Similarly, suggesting that only functional requirements utilize attributes is misleading because both functional and non-functional requirements can and should have attributes to aid in their management. Lastly, claiming that attributes are solely used for documentation purposes reduces their significance; while documentation is one aspect, attributes serve various other functions such as helping in prioritization, traceability, and understanding stakeholder needs.