Which of the following is a true statement regarding conflict in requirements?

Conflicts in requirements are a common occurrence in the process of gathering and analyzing stakeholder needs. Recognizing that conflicts should be expected and planned for reflects a mature understanding of the complexities involved in requirements engineering. Conflicts can arise due to differing stakeholder perspectives, priorities, and interpretations of needs. By anticipating these conflicts, analysts and teams can implement strategies to address them proactively, which can lead to more effective communication and resolution processes.

Planning for conflicts allows organizations to develop mechanisms such as structured discussions, negotiation techniques, and stakeholder engagement sessions that can be employed when disagreements arise. This approach not only helps in resolving issues more efficiently but also fosters a collaborative environment where stakeholders feel heard and valued.

In contrast, the other statements imply a misunderstanding of the nature of conflicts. Suggesting that only immature organizations will experience conflicts overlooks the fact that conflicts are a natural part of any collaborative process, regardless of the organization's maturity. The idea that conflicts result solely from insufficient elicitation fails to acknowledge that differences in opinions, priorities, and interpretations can exist even in well-conducted elicitation processes. Lastly, stating that conflicts are easily resolved with open discussion does not take into account the potential complexity of the issues at hand, which may require more structured approaches to facilitate resolution.