What should you do if a term defined previously represents two different things?

When a term defined previously represents two different concepts, it is essential to update the definition and review any affected requirements. This approach ensures clarity and consistency in communication among all stakeholders involved in a project.

By updating the definition, you provide a more accurate reflection of how the term is used in different contexts. This eliminates confusion and helps in establishing a common understanding among team members, clients, and other relevant parties. Furthermore, reviewing the affected requirements is crucial because any change in the definition can impact the interpretation of those requirements, leading to potential gaps or misunderstandings in what is expected from the project. This thorough examination ensures that all aspects of the requirements are aligned with the newly clarified definition.

Simply keeping the current glossary definition unchanged would not address the issue of ambiguity and could lead to further miscommunication. Choosing one meaning and documenting that only might overlook important aspects or usages of the term that are relevant to different stakeholders. Thus, updating the definition and reviewing affected requirements provides a comprehensive resolution to the problem at hand.