What is a possible consequence of having duplicate requirements?

Having duplicate requirements can lead to increased document length, which is a significant consequence. When the same requirement is stated multiple times, it inflates the overall length of documentation, making it difficult for stakeholders to read, comprehend, and efficiently review the requirements. Increased length may lead to confusion and misinterpretation, as stakeholders might struggle to identify which instance of the requirement should be prioritized or acted upon.

Furthermore, having duplicates does not contribute to improved clarity; rather, it often creates ambiguity about which requirement to follow. Updates can also become more complex because any changes need to be consistently applied to all instances of the duplicates. Overall, managing requirements becomes less efficient when duplication occurs, which emphasizes the importance of clear and concise documentation in the requirements management process.