In which part of a requirements specification would you likely document changes related to user input for banking software?

The correct answer pertains to the specification of goals. This section typically outlines the objectives and intended outcomes of the system, emphasizing what the user expects from the banking software, including functionalities related to user input. Documenting changes in user input highlights the goals associated with improving user experience, accuracy, and efficiency in transactions and data entry.

When modifications to user input requirements occur, they directly influence the system’s goals, ensuring that the final product aligns with user needs and business strategies. This is the most logical place for documenting changes, as it allows stakeholders to understand how revisions in user input requirements contribute to achieving the intended results and operational targets of the banking software.

In contrast, the other sections, while important in their own right, focus on different aspects of the requirements specification. For instance, documenting system states would involve describing how the system behaves under various conditions rather than specifically detailing user input. Similarly, the inputs and outputs context refers to the operational aspects of how data is handled but might not delve deeply into changes regarding what users are supposed to provide. Lastly, the class model description is more technical and concerns the structure and relationships within the system rather than user-focused changes.